What Is Sugar
Sugar is a modern PHP (8.2+) templating engine that compiles to pure, optimized PHP code. Sugar templates are still PHP templates at their core, just with a handful of extra superpowers layered in.
Think of it as syntactic PHP: you write HTML and PHP like you always have, but you also get s: directives, safe output, and composable helpers without a separate template language.
Sugar supercharges existing PHP templates with:
- Clean
s:directivesyntax for control structures. - Context-aware XSS escaping for HTML, JavaScript, CSS, and URLs.
- Loop metadata, conditional classes, and empty state fallbacks.
- Full compatibility with existing
<?= $var ?>output.
The best part? Zero runtime overhead. Sugar compiles once to pure PHP, then opcache takes over for maximum performance.
Feature Comparison
Legend: ✅ yes, ❌ no or limited (text used where not binary or when features are optional)
These are high-level defaults as commonly described; behavior can vary by version, configuration, and framework integration. Use this table as a quick orientation and confirm details in the official docs for your stack.
| Feature | Sugar | Blade | Twig | Latte | Tempest | Smarty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning Curve | PHP + s: | Custom | Python-like | PHP-like | PHP + :attr | Custom |
| AST parser | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Context-aware escaping | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | Optional |
| Full PHP interop | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Scope isolation | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Layout inheritance | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Compiles to PHP | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Components | s- files | Class/File | Macros/Embed | N:attributes | x- files | Blocks/partials |
| IDE Support | Native PHP | Plugins | Plugins | Plugins | Native PHP | Plugins |
| Security | Auto + isolate | Basic HTML | Sandbox mode | Context + Sandbox | Auto + isolate | Auto optional |
| Debugging | Native traces | Good | Can be hard | Tracy plugin | Native traces | Plugins |
| Pipes/Filters | Native |> - funcs | Helpers | |upper | |upper | Native funcs | Modifiers |
Notes on the criteria:
- Performance: whether templates compile to PHP and benefit from opcache at runtime.
- Learning curve: how much new syntax you need to learn beyond PHP and HTML.
- AST parser: whether the engine parses templates into a structured AST before compiling.
- Context-aware escaping: automatic escaping beyond HTML (attributes, URLs, JS, CSS).
- PHP interop: ability to use PHP directly in templates without a separate language layer.
- Scope isolation: whether includes/components isolate variables by default.
- Compiles to PHP: whether the engine produces PHP code that can be cached by OPcache at runtime.
How Sugar Compares (Neutral Overview)
Every engine makes different tradeoffs in syntax, safety, and integration. Sugar is designed to feel like native PHP templates with attribute-driven directives. Other engines lean into custom syntax, tag-based DSLs, or class-based components. None of these approaches are universally better; they fit different teams and constraints.
Syntax and Familiarity
Sugar keeps standard PHP and HTML intact, adding s: attributes for structure. That makes it easy for teams already comfortable with PHP templates. Engines like Blade or Twig offer more opinionated syntax that can be cleaner for designers, but they also introduce a separate language to learn and debug.
Escaping and Safety
Sugar focuses on context-aware escaping across HTML, attributes, URLs, JS, and CSS. Some engines default to HTML-only escaping or require explicit filters for non-HTML contexts. In practice, the best choice depends on how much dynamic data your templates handle and how strict you want the defaults to be.
Components and Composition
Sugar uses s- prefixed component templates with props and slots. Other engines may use class-based components, macros, or custom tags. Sugar leans on template binding to keep logic close to the template without requiring class-backed components.
Inheritance and Includes
Sugar supports layout inheritance and includes with scope isolation. Some engines expose more granular inheritance features (like named stacks), while others prioritize component composition over layout inheritance. If your app is component-first, you may lean more on component systems than template inheritance regardless of engine.
Performance and Debugging
Sugar compiles to pure PHP and relies on opcache, similar to many engines. Debugging experience often comes down to the quality of compiled output and source mapping. Sugar aims to keep compiled output readable so stack traces are still useful.
When Sugar Is a Good Fit
Sugar tends to work well for teams that want a PHP-first template style, attribute-based control flow, and context-aware escaping without adopting a separate template language. If your team prefers a full DSL or a framework-specific component model, another engine might feel more natural.
Before and After
Your existing PHP template:
<?php if (!empty($users)): ?>
<?php foreach ($users as $user): ?>
<div class="<?= $user->isAdmin() ? 'admin' : 'user' ?>">
<?= htmlspecialchars($user->name, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') ?>
<?php if ($user->email): ?>
<small><?= htmlspecialchars($user->email, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8') ?></small>
<?php endif; ?>
</div>
<?php endforeach; ?>
<?php else: ?>
<p>No users found</p>
<?php endif; ?>Converted to Sugar:
<div s:forelse="$users as $user" s:class="['admin' => $user->isAdmin(), 'user' => !$user->isAdmin()]">
<?= $user->name ?>
<small s:if="$user->email"><?= $user->email ?></small>
</div>
<div s:empty>No users found</div>Compiles to optimized PHP:
<?php if (!\Sugar\Runtime\EmptyHelper::isEmpty($users)): ?>
<?php foreach ($users as $user): ?>
<div class="<?= \Sugar\Runtime\HtmlAttributeHelper::classNames(['admin' => $user->isAdmin(), 'user' => !$user->isAdmin()]) ?>">
<?= \Sugar\Escape\Escaper::html($user->name) ?>
<?php if ($user->email): ?>
<small><?= \Sugar\Escape\Escaper::html($user->email) ?></small>
<?php endif; ?>
</div>
<?php endforeach; ?>
<?php else: ?>
<div>No users found</div>
<?php endif; ?>Why Sugar
| Benefit | Why it matters |
|---|---|
s: attributes keep templates readable | Control flow and output stay close to the HTML. |
| Context-aware escaping by default | XSS protection across HTML, attribute, URL, JS, and CSS contexts. |
| Pure PHP output | Fast execution and debuggable stack traces. |
| Scope isolation | Prevents accidental variable leakage between templates. |
| Still PHP, so IDEs play nice | Native syntax highlighting, navigation, and refactors work out of the box. (at least for code within PHP tags) |
| Zero core dependencies | Easy to embed and audit. |